Banbury: New Boundaries 2013 Calculation

This page shows the detail of the calculations performed to estimate the general election result for 2010 had the new boundaries for Banbury been in force at that time. The basic idea of the calculation is to look at the district council wards which make up the new seat, and estimate how they voted in 2010. This estimate is based on the recent local election results in those wards, with adjustments made to allow for different turnouts and different voting patterns for local and general elections.

Due to changes in ward boundaries, some new wards are divided among several old constituencies (and sometimes in Scotland between two new constituencies). Such wards are shown divided into several parts, called [1], [2], and so on.

Election results from a recent local election are given. This is usually the local election closest to 2010 from the period 2007-2011. For multiple-member wards, the votes shown are the sum of the votes cast for all candidates of each party. A negative number indicates candidate(s) elected unopposed. Where zero votes are shown, the ward results have not yet been acquired, and the implied result is still provisional and will be improved later.

Calculation method

There are two problems with using the raw (actual) local election results to imply general election results ward-by-ward. Firstly, turnout can be different between local and general elections, which means that the total number of local votes cast does not equal the number of votes cast in each old seat at the general election. To correct for this, we adjust the local votes to match the general election turnout. Each ward's result is scaled, whilst keeping constant the percentage support for each party, so that the total turnout adds up to the old seat's general election turnout. All wards in the old seat are assumed to have the same percentage turnout.

Secondly, even though we now have the correct number of votes in the old seat, the party totals will not match the general election result. Some parties do better at the local election than the general election, and others do vice versa. We call these strong and weak parties respectively. The next step is to transfer votes from strong parties to weak parties. This is done by taking votes proportionally away from strong parties and putting them in a transfer pool. For instance if a party got 12,500 local votes, but only 10,000 general election votes, it will lose 20% of its votes from each ward. These votes in each ward will be put in the ward's transfer pool and allocated to the weak parties. Weak parties will get votes transferred to them in proportion to the votes they need over the old seat. For instance, if two weak parties need 4,000 and 1,000 votes respectively, the first party will get 80% of each ward's transfer pool and the second party will get 20% of each ward's transfer pool. The transfer of votes between parties is done on a ward-by-ward basis using these common percentages.

More details of the calculation formulas are available.

List of old seats forming part of Banbury

The old seat(s) needed are:

Old seat: Banbury

Workings for Banbury

The raw vote table shows the district council election results for all the wards in the old seat of Banbury. The first block shows the actual results, the second block shows the turnout-adjusted results. Details of the transfer calculation are given below this table.

Old seat: BanburyActual ResultsTurnout-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElection
Year
Electorate
2010
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
CherwellAdderbury20082,300682022601,156038301,539
CherwellAmbrosden and Chesterton20112,427718025701,196042801,624
CherwellBanbury Calthorpe20104,0761,46853759901,53756262702,726
CherwellBanbury Easington20105,9172,28389583702,25188282503,958
CherwellBanbury Grimsbury and Castle20107,2251,6941,1761,08002,0731,4391,32204,834
CherwellBanbury Hardwick20105,9541,7678571,03001,9269341,12303,983
CherwellBanbury Neithrop20104,31994993056401,1221,10066702,889
CherwellBanbury Ruscote20105,5179581,52546301,2001,91158003,691
CherwellBicester East20114,058972641001,6361,079002,715
CherwellBicester North20114,5651,01343227501,79976748803,054
CherwellBicester South20113,608677234550861,0563658581342,413
CherwellBicester Town20113,642852557001,473963002,436
CherwellBicester West20105,2741,94890478101,89287875903,529
CherwellBloxham and Bodicote20104,7652,02501,46101,85201,33603,188
CherwellCaversfield20081,88951053100097210119101,264
CherwellCropredy20112,25374816380255905197973081,507
CherwellDeddington20102,1261,05505650926049601,422
CherwellFringford20101,8671,11703160974027501,249
CherwellHook Norton20112,091686367119081943814201,399
CherwellLaunton20082,060-10001,3780001,378
CherwellSibford20102,1711,147051501,002045001,452
CherwellThe Astons and Heyfords20103,7901,804088901,699083702,536
CherwellWroxton20102,16997606610865058601,451
 Total 84,063    31,70911,61612,47044256,237

The transfer table below shows the votes cast in the old seat of Banbury at the general election, as well as the total local turnout-adjusted votes. The number of votes to transfer, shown in the fourth and fifth columns, are the difference between the general and local votes. Strong parties will have votes transferred away, and weak parties will have votes transferred into them. The final column describes how votes will be transferred away from or into that party on a ward-by-ward basis. If a party is too strong, it will lose a percentage of its votes in each ward which go into that ward's transfer pool. If a party is too weak, it will gain votes from each ward's transfer pool in proportion to the number of transfer votes it needs over the whole old seat.

PartyGeneral
Election 2010
Votes
Local Election
Turnout-adjusted
Votes
Votes to
transfer
away
Votes to
transfer
into
Ward Transfers needed
CON29,70331,7092,0060Transfer away 6.3% (= 2006 / 31709) of ward's CON votes
LAB10,77311,6168430Transfer away 7.3% (= 843 / 11616) of ward's LAB votes
LIB11,47612,4709940Transfer away 8.0% (= 994 / 12470) of ward's LIB votes
OTH4,28944203,847Transfer in 100.0% (= 3847 / 3847) of ward's transfer pool votes
Total56,24156,2373,8473,847 

Main table for Banbury

The main table shows the transfer-adjusted results for each ward in the old seat of Banbury, as well as showing which new seat each ward is in.

Old seat: BanburyTransfer-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElectorate
2010
New Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
CherwellAdderbury2,300Banbury1,08303521041,539
CherwellAmbrosden and Chesterton2,427Henley and Thame1,12003941101,624
CherwellBanbury Calthorpe4,076Banbury1,4405215771882,726
CherwellBanbury Easington5,917Banbury2,1098187592723,958
CherwellBanbury Grimsbury and Castle7,225Banbury1,9421,3351,2173414,834
CherwellBanbury Hardwick5,954Banbury1,8048661,0332793,983
CherwellBanbury Neithrop4,319Banbury1,0511,0206142042,889
CherwellBanbury Ruscote5,517Banbury1,1241,7725342613,691
CherwellBicester East4,058Banbury1,5331,00101822,715
CherwellBicester North4,565Banbury1,6857114492083,054
CherwellBicester South3,608Banbury9893397902962,413
CherwellBicester Town3,642Banbury1,38089301632,436
CherwellBicester West5,274Banbury1,7728146982443,529
CherwellBloxham and Bodicote4,765Banbury1,73501,2302243,188
CherwellCaversfield1,889Banbury91194176841,264
CherwellCropredy2,253Banbury848183893871,507
CherwellDeddington2,126Banbury8670456981,422
CherwellFringford1,867Banbury9120253841,249
CherwellHook Norton2,091Banbury767406131951,399
CherwellLaunton2,060Henley and Thame1,29100871,378
CherwellSibford2,171Banbury9390414991,452
CherwellThe Astons and Heyfords3,790Banbury1,59207701742,536
CherwellWroxton2,169Banbury81005391011,451
 Total84,063 29,70410,77311,4754,28556,237

After transfer adjustment, the totals for each party over all the wards match the general election vote in the old seat.

New seat: Banbury

The new seat of Banbury is made up of the following wards, with the transfer-adjusted votes shown.

New seat: Banbury
DistrictWardElectorate
2010
Old Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
CherwellAdderbury2,300Banbury1,08303521041,539
CherwellBanbury Calthorpe4,076Banbury1,4405215771882,726
CherwellBanbury Easington5,917Banbury2,1098187592723,958
CherwellBanbury Grimsbury and Castle7,225Banbury1,9421,3351,2173414,834
CherwellBanbury Hardwick5,954Banbury1,8048661,0332793,983
CherwellBanbury Neithrop4,319Banbury1,0511,0206142042,889
CherwellBanbury Ruscote5,517Banbury1,1241,7725342613,691
CherwellBicester East4,058Banbury1,5331,00101822,715
CherwellBicester North4,565Banbury1,6857114492083,054
CherwellBicester South3,608Banbury9893397902962,413
CherwellBicester Town3,642Banbury1,38089301632,436
CherwellBicester West5,274Banbury1,7728146982443,529
CherwellBloxham and Bodicote4,765Banbury1,73501,2302243,188
CherwellCaversfield1,889Banbury91194176841,264
CherwellCropredy2,253Banbury848183893871,507
CherwellDeddington2,126Banbury8670456981,422
CherwellFringford1,867Banbury9120253841,249
CherwellHook Norton2,091Banbury767406131951,399
CherwellSibford2,171Banbury9390414991,452
CherwellThe Astons and Heyfords3,790Banbury1,59207701742,536
CherwellWroxton2,169Banbury81005391011,451
 Total79,576 27,29310,77311,0814,08853,235

And these are the implied results for 2010 for the new seat of Banbury.