Birmingham Edgbaston: New Boundaries 2013 Calculation

This page shows the detail of the calculations performed to estimate the general election result for 2010 had the new boundaries for Birmingham Edgbaston been in force at that time. The basic idea of the calculation is to look at the district council wards which make up the new seat, and estimate how they voted in 2010. This estimate is based on the recent local election results in those wards, with adjustments made to allow for different turnouts and different voting patterns for local and general elections.

Due to changes in ward boundaries, some new wards are divided among several old constituencies (and sometimes in Scotland between two new constituencies). Such wards are shown divided into several parts, called [1], [2], and so on.

Election results from a recent local election are given. This is usually the local election closest to 2010 from the period 2007-2011. For multiple-member wards, the votes shown are the sum of the votes cast for all candidates of each party. A negative number indicates candidate(s) elected unopposed. Where zero votes are shown, the ward results have not yet been acquired, and the implied result is still provisional and will be improved later.

Calculation method

There are two problems with using the raw (actual) local election results to imply general election results ward-by-ward. Firstly, turnout can be different between local and general elections, which means that the total number of local votes cast does not equal the number of votes cast in each old seat at the general election. To correct for this, we adjust the local votes to match the general election turnout. Each ward's result is scaled, whilst keeping constant the percentage support for each party, so that the total turnout adds up to the old seat's general election turnout. All wards in the old seat are assumed to have the same percentage turnout.

Secondly, even though we now have the correct number of votes in the old seat, the party totals will not match the general election result. Some parties do better at the local election than the general election, and others do vice versa. We call these strong and weak parties respectively. The next step is to transfer votes from strong parties to weak parties. This is done by taking votes proportionally away from strong parties and putting them in a transfer pool. For instance if a party got 12,500 local votes, but only 10,000 general election votes, it will lose 20% of its votes from each ward. These votes in each ward will be put in the ward's transfer pool and allocated to the weak parties. Weak parties will get votes transferred to them in proportion to the votes they need over the old seat. For instance, if two weak parties need 4,000 and 1,000 votes respectively, the first party will get 80% of each ward's transfer pool and the second party will get 20% of each ward's transfer pool. The transfer of votes between parties is done on a ward-by-ward basis using these common percentages.

More details of the calculation formulas are available.

List of old seats forming part of Birmingham Edgbaston

The old seat(s) needed are:

Old seat: Birmingham Hall Green

Workings for Birmingham Hall Green

The raw vote table shows the district council election results for all the wards in the old seat of Birmingham Hall Green. The first block shows the actual results, the second block shows the turnout-adjusted results. Details of the transfer calculation are given below this table.

Old seat: Birmingham Hall GreenActual ResultsTurnout-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElection
Year
Electorate
2010
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamHall Green201019,1223,3362,8824,6911,8993,1452,7174,4231,79012,075
BirminghamMoseley and Kings Heath201018,6171,8884,0614,3002,3731,7593,7834,0052,21011,757
BirminghamSparkbrook201019,4071,0273,8789735,4681,1094,1891,0515,90712,256
BirminghamSpringfield201020,0119244,2253,3623,5819664,4163,5143,74312,639
 Total 77,157    6,97915,10512,99313,65048,727

The transfer table below shows the votes cast in the old seat of Birmingham Hall Green at the general election, as well as the total local turnout-adjusted votes. The number of votes to transfer, shown in the fourth and fifth columns, are the difference between the general and local votes. Strong parties will have votes transferred away, and weak parties will have votes transferred into them. The final column describes how votes will be transferred away from or into that party on a ward-by-ward basis. If a party is too strong, it will lose a percentage of its votes in each ward which go into that ward's transfer pool. If a party is too weak, it will gain votes from each ward's transfer pool in proportion to the number of transfer votes it needs over the whole old seat.

PartyGeneral
Election 2010
Votes
Local Election
Turnout-adjusted
Votes
Votes to
transfer
away
Votes to
transfer
into
Ward Transfers needed
CON7,3206,9790341Transfer in 26.7% (= 341 / 1275) of ward's transfer pool votes
LAB16,03915,1050934Transfer in 73.3% (= 934 / 1275) of ward's transfer pool votes
LIB11,98812,9931,0050Transfer away 7.7% (= 1005 / 12993) of ward's LIB votes
OTH13,38013,6502700Transfer away 2.0% (= 270 / 13650) of ward's OTH votes
Total48,72748,7271,2751,275 

Main table for Birmingham Hall Green

The main table shows the transfer-adjusted results for each ward in the old seat of Birmingham Hall Green, as well as showing which new seat each ward is in.

Old seat: Birmingham Hall GreenTransfer-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElectorate
2010
New Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamHall Green19,122Birmingham Hall Green3,2462,9944,0811,75512,075
BirminghamMoseley and Kings Heath18,617Birmingham Edgbaston1,8544,0423,6952,16611,757
BirminghamSparkbrook19,407Birmingham Edgbaston1,1624,3349705,79012,256
BirminghamSpringfield20,011Birmingham Hall Green1,0584,6693,2423,66912,639
 Total77,157 7,32016,03911,98813,38048,727

After transfer adjustment, the totals for each party over all the wards match the general election vote in the old seat.

Old seat: Birmingham Edgbaston

Workings for Birmingham Edgbaston

The raw vote table shows the district council election results for all the wards in the old seat of Birmingham Edgbaston. The first block shows the actual results, the second block shows the turnout-adjusted results. Details of the transfer calculation are given below this table.

Old seat: Birmingham EdgbastonActual ResultsTurnout-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElection
Year
Electorate
2010
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamBartley Green201017,6914,5083,2901,2679874,7773,4871,3431,04610,653
BirminghamEdgbaston201017,4903,8323,0362,0535594,2573,3732,28162110,532
BirminghamHarborne201016,4734,6403,7661,6091,0334,1663,3811,4459279,919
BirminghamQuinton201017,3854,1424,2981,4131,0013,9954,1451,36396510,468
 Total 69,039    17,19514,3866,4323,55941,572

The transfer table below shows the votes cast in the old seat of Birmingham Edgbaston at the general election, as well as the total local turnout-adjusted votes. The number of votes to transfer, shown in the fourth and fifth columns, are the difference between the general and local votes. Strong parties will have votes transferred away, and weak parties will have votes transferred into them. The final column describes how votes will be transferred away from or into that party on a ward-by-ward basis. If a party is too strong, it will lose a percentage of its votes in each ward which go into that ward's transfer pool. If a party is too weak, it will gain votes from each ward's transfer pool in proportion to the number of transfer votes it needs over the whole old seat.

PartyGeneral
Election 2010
Votes
Local Election
Turnout-adjusted
Votes
Votes to
transfer
away
Votes to
transfer
into
Ward Transfers needed
CON15,62017,1951,5750Transfer away 9.2% (= 1575 / 17195) of ward's CON votes
LAB16,89414,38602,508Transfer in 100.0% (= 2508 / 2508) of ward's transfer pool votes
LIB6,3876,432450Transfer away 0.7% (= 45 / 6432) of ward's LIB votes
OTH2,6703,5598890Transfer away 25.0% (= 889 / 3559) of ward's OTH votes
Total41,57141,5722,5082,508 

Main table for Birmingham Edgbaston

The main table shows the transfer-adjusted results for each ward in the old seat of Birmingham Edgbaston, as well as showing which new seat each ward is in.

Old seat: Birmingham EdgbastonTransfer-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElectorate
2010
New Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamBartley Green17,691Birmingham Harborne4,3394,1951,33478510,653
BirminghamEdgbaston17,490Birmingham Edgbaston3,8673,9342,26546610,532
BirminghamHarborne16,473Birmingham Harborne3,7844,0041,4356959,919
BirminghamQuinton17,385Birmingham Harborne3,6294,7621,35372410,468
 Total69,039 15,61916,8956,3872,67041,572

After transfer adjustment, the totals for each party over all the wards match the general election vote in the old seat.

Old seat: Birmingham Selly Oak

Workings for Birmingham Selly Oak

The raw vote table shows the district council election results for all the wards in the old seat of Birmingham Selly Oak. The first block shows the actual results, the second block shows the turnout-adjusted results. Details of the transfer calculation are given below this table.

Old seat: Birmingham Selly OakActual ResultsTurnout-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElection
Year
Electorate
2010
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamBillesley201019,1983,8324,0431,6921,6134,0494,2721,7881,70411,813
BirminghamBournville201019,2984,78102,8445,4994,32602,5734,97611,875
BirminghamBrandwood201018,5673,7724,7061,9291,1863,7174,6381,9011,16911,425
BirminghamSelly Oak201018,6052,2143,1424,5367632,3793,3764,87482011,449
 Total 75,668    14,47112,28611,1368,66946,562

The transfer table below shows the votes cast in the old seat of Birmingham Selly Oak at the general election, as well as the total local turnout-adjusted votes. The number of votes to transfer, shown in the fourth and fifth columns, are the difference between the general and local votes. Strong parties will have votes transferred away, and weak parties will have votes transferred into them. The final column describes how votes will be transferred away from or into that party on a ward-by-ward basis. If a party is too strong, it will lose a percentage of its votes in each ward which go into that ward's transfer pool. If a party is too weak, it will gain votes from each ward's transfer pool in proportion to the number of transfer votes it needs over the whole old seat.

PartyGeneral
Election 2010
Votes
Local Election
Turnout-adjusted
Votes
Votes to
transfer
away
Votes to
transfer
into
Ward Transfers needed
CON14,46814,47130Transfer away 0.0% (= 3 / 14471) of ward's CON votes
LAB17,95012,28605,664Transfer in 100.0% (= 5664 / 5664) of ward's transfer pool votes
LIB10,37111,1367650Transfer away 6.9% (= 765 / 11136) of ward's LIB votes
OTH3,7748,6694,8950Transfer away 56.5% (= 4895 / 8669) of ward's OTH votes
Total46,56346,5625,6645,664 

Main table for Birmingham Selly Oak

The main table shows the transfer-adjusted results for each ward in the old seat of Birmingham Selly Oak, as well as showing which new seat each ward is in.

Old seat: Birmingham Selly OakTransfer-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElectorate
2010
New Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamBillesley19,198Birmingham Hall Green4,0485,3581,66574211,813
BirminghamBournville19,298Birmingham Northfield4,3252,9872,3962,16611,875
BirminghamBrandwood18,567Birmingham Hall Green3,7165,4291,77050911,425
BirminghamSelly Oak18,605Birmingham Edgbaston2,3794,1744,53935711,449
 Total75,668 14,46817,94810,3703,77446,562

After transfer adjustment, the totals for each party over all the wards match the general election vote in the old seat.

New seat: Birmingham Edgbaston

The new seat of Birmingham Edgbaston is made up of the following wards, with the transfer-adjusted votes shown.

New seat: Birmingham Edgbaston
DistrictWardElectorate
2010
Old Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BirminghamMoseley and Kings Heath18,617Birmingham Hall Green1,8544,0423,6952,16611,757
BirminghamSparkbrook19,407Birmingham Hall Green1,1624,3349705,79012,256
BirminghamEdgbaston17,490Birmingham Edgbaston3,8673,9342,26546610,532
BirminghamSelly Oak18,605Birmingham Selly Oak2,3794,1744,53935711,449
 Total74,119 9,26216,48411,4698,77945,994

And these are the implied results for 2010 for the new seat of Birmingham Edgbaston.