Greenford and Sudbury: New Boundaries 2018 Calculation

Greenford and Sudbury: Overview

 Projection: LAB seat 

Implied MP at 2017: Steve Pound  (LAB)
County/Area: Ealing (London)
Electorate: 72,517
Turnout: 71.1%

 Implied 2017 VotesImplied 2017 Share
LAB33,41364.8%
CON15,52330.1%
LIB1,4752.9%
Green7771.5%
UKIP3360.7%
OTH540.1%
LAB Majority17,89034.7%

See overview of other seats in London.

Greenford and Sudbury : Political and Demographic indicators

The table below shows some political and demographic numerical indicators for the new Greenford and Sudbury constituency, the 'London' area and nation.

The political measures include the Left/Right and International/National axes (what does this mean).

The demographic measures are from the 2011 Census and include categories relating to national identity, economic activity, health and education. These categories are those which have the most relevance to political attitudes.

IndicatorSeatLondonAll GB
Party WinnerLABLABCON
Economic Position6° Right11° Right
National Position30° Int29° Int1° Int
EU Leave %42%40%52%
British Identity27%38%29%
Good Health45%50%48%
UK Born89%64%88%
Good Education34%48%39%
Good Job47%61%51%
High SEC48%55%51%
Average Age48.144.148.5
ABC1 Class49%62%53%

Greenford and Sudbury ranks #495 for "Leave", #186 for "Right" and #564 for "National" out of 600 new seats.

Indicators: Legend and Descriptions

Indicators : Legend and Descriptions

The colour scheme used in the table above is explained in the legend table below. The eight census indicators (British Identity, Good Health, UK Born, Good Education, Good Job, High SEC, Average Age and AB1 Class) all use the same 'Census' colour scheme indicating whether the area's level is above or below the national average.

TopicCat 1Cat 2Cat 3Cat 4Cat 5
Economic PositionVery LeftLeftCentristRightVery Right
National PositionVery IntInternationalCentristNationalVery Nat
EU Leave %Very RemainRemainBalancedLeaveVery Leave
CensusVery LowLowMediumHighVery High

Indicator definitions are given in terms of political data definitions or census categories:

IndicatorCensus
Question
Definition / Included Census Categories
Party WinnerArea party winner : actual election result or projected by Electoral Calculus
Economic PositionEconomic position between 100° Left and 100° Right, estimated by Electoral Calculus from political and demographic data.
National PositionNational position between 100° International and 100° National, estimated by Electoral Calculus from political and demographic data.
EU Leave %EU Referendum vote share for 'Leave' : actual result or estimate
British IdentityNational Identity (KS202)Those answering British, British-Other, or Scottish-British
Good HealthHealth (KS301)Those answering 'Very Good Health'
UK BornCountry of Birth (QS203)Those answering England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, GB Other, or UK Other
Good EducationHighest level of Qualification (QS501)Level 3 (A-level equivalent) or Level 4+ (degree equivalent)
Good JobOccupation (QS606)Occupation codes 1xx to 4xx (Managers, Professionals, Associates, and office workers)
High SECNS-SeC of Household Reference Person (QS609)National Statistics Socio-economic Classification from 1 to 4 (higher managers and professionals, lower managers and professionals, intermediate occupations, small employers and self-employed).
Average AgeAge (QS103)Average age of adults (18 years and above)
ABC1 ClassApproximated Social Grade (QS611)Approximated social grades A, B and C1

Greenford and Sudbury: Map

Boundary Lines courtesy of Ordnance Survey OpenData © Crown copyright 2015

Introduction

This page shows the detail of the calculations performed to estimate the general election result for 2017 had the new boundaries for Greenford and Sudbury been in force at that time. The basic idea of the calculation is to look at the district council wards which make up the new seat, and estimate how they voted in 2017. This estimate is based on the recent local election results in those wards, with adjustments made to allow for different turnouts and different voting patterns for local and general elections.

In many cases, wards are divided between several old constituencies or between new constituencies. So the same ward may be shown more than once, but the electorate shown will reflect that ward sub-section.

Election results from a recent local election are given. This is usually the local election closest to 2015 from the period 2012-2015. For multiple-member wards, the votes shown are the sum of the votes cast for all candidates of each party. A negative number indicates candidate(s) elected unopposed.

Calculation method

There are two problems with using the raw (actual) local election results to imply general election results ward-by-ward. Firstly, turnout can be different between local and general elections, which means that the total number of local votes cast does not equal the number of votes cast in each old seat at the general election. To correct for this, we adjust the local votes to match the general election turnout. Each ward's result is scaled, whilst keeping constant the percentage support for each party, so that the total turnout adds up to the old seat's general election turnout. All wards in the old seat are assumed to have the same percentage turnout.

Secondly, even though we now have the correct number of votes in the old seat, the party totals will not match the general election result. Some parties do better at the local election than the general election, and others do vice versa. We call these strong and weak parties respectively. The next step is to transfer votes from strong parties to weak parties. This is done by taking votes proportionally away from strong parties and putting them in a transfer pool. For instance if a party got 12,500 local votes, but only 10,000 general election votes, it will lose 20% over all the wards. These votes in each ward will be put in the ward's transfer pool and allocated to the weak parties. Weak parties will get votes transferred to them in proportion to the votes they need over the old seat. For instance, if two weak parties need 4,000 and 1,000 votes respectively, the first party will get 80% of each ward's transfer pool and the second party will get 20% of each ward's transfer pool. The transfer of votes between parties is done using the Electoral Calculus Transition Model.

More details of the calculation formulas are available.

List of old seats forming part of Greenford and Sudbury

The old seat(s) needed are:

Old seat: Brent North

The table shows the transfer-adjusted results for each ward in the old seat of Brent North, as well as showing which new seat each ward is in.

Old seat: Brent NorthTransfer-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElectorate
2017
New SeatCON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
UKIP
Votes
Green
Votes
NAT
Votes
MIN
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BrentAlperton9,004Wembley1,2464,55128205200246,155
BrentBarnhill10,168Wembley2,2034,50593010500466,952
BrentFryent8,619Wembley1,7823,77125007700125,892
BrentKenton7,800Harrow South and Kenton3,0712,1275007300125,333
BrentNorthwick Park8,235Greenford and Sudbury2,3783,115900370095,629
BrentPreston9,890Wembley2,5603,94386012300496,761
BrentQueensbury9,734Harrow South and Kenton2,5753,734223010300206,655
BrentSudbury9,621Greenford and Sudbury1,3534,84529104400456,578
BrentWembley Central9,484Wembley1,2674,90424704500206,483
 Total82,555 18,43535,4951,61206590023756,438

The full details of these calculations are given on the Brent North seat details page. Click on "Show workings".

Old seat: Ealing North

The table shows the transfer-adjusted results for each ward in the old seat of Ealing North, as well as showing which new seat each ward is in.

Old seat: Ealing NorthTransfer-adjusted Results
DistrictWardElectorate
2017
New SeatCON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
UKIP
Votes
Green
Votes
NAT
Votes
MIN
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
EalingCleveland8,957Greenford and Sudbury2,4173,37731711810006,293
EalingGreenford Broadway10,780Greenford and Sudbury1,8055,56112074110007,571
EalingGreenford Green8,951Greenford and Sudbury2,1363,805172321420006,287
EalingHobbayne8,792Greenford and Sudbury1,6764,010230432180006,177
EalingNorth Greenford9,092Greenford and Sudbury1,7094,321154167360006,387
EalingNortholt Mandeville9,354Hillingdon and Uxbridge1,8404,34695264240006,569
EalingNortholt West End9,361Hillingdon and Uxbridge1,3114,83586321230006,576
EalingPerivale9,477Greenford and Sudbury2,0494,379101191080006,656
 Total74,764 14,94334,6341,27592174300052,516

The full details of these calculations are given on the Ealing North seat details page. Click on "Show workings".

New seat: Greenford and Sudbury

The new seat of Greenford and Sudbury is made up of the following wards, with the transfer-adjusted votes shown.

New seat: Greenford and Sudbury
DistrictWardElectorate
2017
Old Seat CON
Votes
LAB
Votes
LIB
Votes
UKIP
Votes
Green
Votes
NAT
Votes
MIN
Votes
OTH
Votes
Total
Votes
BrentNorthwick Park8,919Brent North2,3783,115900370095,629
BrentSudbury8,874Brent North1,3534,84529104400456,578
EalingCleveland9,209Ealing North2,4173,37731711810006,293
EalingGreenford Broadway10,465Ealing North1,8055,56112074110007,571
EalingGreenford Green8,405Ealing North2,1363,805172321420006,287
EalingHobbayne8,858Ealing North1,6764,010230432180006,177
EalingNorth Greenford8,849Ealing North1,7094,321154167360006,387
EalingPerivale8,938Ealing North2,0494,379101191080006,656
 Total72,517 15,52333,4131,475336777005451,578

And these are the implied results for 2017 for the new seat of Greenford and Sudbury.


© 2017 Martin Baxter
Powered by TigerLib (11-Sep-2017 15:41)